O
Albuquerque
← Community
DevelopmentCommunity discussion

Rental practices ordinance O-25-102

Albuquerque

Summary not yet generated for this topic.

Community sentiment

Supportive (12)Opposed (4)

At a glance

Public comments
16
Last 30 days
0

Last discussed Jan 21, 2026.

Public comments (16)

SupportiveAlexander KaltenbachJan 21, 2026

A UNM economics TA who argued fee disclosure and caps lower market friction and help both renters and landlords; urged a yes vote.

City Council — January 21, 2026 · 33:24 →
SupportiveAlexis TorresJan 21, 2026

A renter who asked why the ordinance wasn't passed and praised Councilor Rogers as the only councilor who cares about renters.

City Council — January 21, 2026 · 40:04 →
SupportiveLeila SalimJan 21, 2026

A South Valley renter who said SB 267 passed at the state level but isn't being enforced; urged the council to pass local enforcement.

City Council — January 21, 2026 · 39:58 →
SupportiveNikil PailurJan 21, 2026

DSA co-chair citing a Searchlight New Mexico report on weak tenant law enforcement, urging local codification.

City Council — January 21, 2026 · 54:00 →
SupportiveBrandon CottleJan 21, 2026

A landlord and former apartment manager who read the bill and found nothing onerous; urged passage.

City Council — January 21, 2026 · 3:00:21 →
SupportiveCarla HumphriesJan 21, 2026

A downtown teacher and renter who described paying hundreds in undisclosed monthly fees, including a fee to pay rent, in violation of SB 267.

City Council — January 21, 2026 · 3:00:57 →
SupportiveAdriana WyakiJan 21, 2026

A housing justice organizer with OLÉ who said the council must show it cares about renters by passing the bill.

City Council — January 21, 2026 · 3:03:29 →
SupportiveMohammed AljiburiJan 21, 2026

Described his family paying escalating application fees year after year without getting units; urged a yes vote.

City Council — January 21, 2026 · 3:03:17 →
OpposedAlan LisseckJan 21, 2026

A landlord representative who argued the bill conflicts with state law's remedy process and suggested the city fund a landlord-tenant hotline instead.

City Council — January 21, 2026 · 3:08:38 →
OpposedJosh PriceJan 21, 2026

A realtor and property manager who argued the ordinance penalizes before proof and asked the council to give SB 267 time to work.

City Council — January 21, 2026 · 3:10:52 →
SupportiveJacob HamJan 21, 2026

A District 6 renter with OLÉ Renters Revolution who described black mold and double-billed utilities and demanded the council protect renters.

City Council — January 21, 2026 · 3:11:52 →
SupportiveTeresa StorchJan 21, 2026

A former legal aid attorney who said the bill is about enforcement, which tenants cannot afford to pursue privately.

City Council — January 21, 2026 · 2:42:04 →
SupportiveMonet SilvaJan 21, 2026

Executive director of the NM Coalition to End Homelessness who said fees push households into eviction and homelessness; penalties are necessary.

City Council — January 21, 2026 · 3:17:06 →
OpposedChristopher Shane TannerJan 21, 2026

GAAR government affairs chair who argued parallel enforcement creates confusion and said SB 267 has only been law six months.

City Council — January 21, 2026 · 3:22:02 →
OpposedChris BenegisJan 21, 2026

GAAR president representing 4,000+ members who supported tenant protections but asked the council to let SB 267 work first.

City Council — January 21, 2026 · 3:23:18 →
SupportiveMarcelyn CostonerJan 21, 2026

Called 'double enforcement' a myth, saying the city cannot enforce without an ordinance, and warned that amending out the fees removes any teeth.

City Council — January 21, 2026 · 3:24:33 →